Home

 

After the boom of deep mines and the exhaustion of many surface mines in the North Fork Watershed, the land and water were left in ruin.  Coal refuse was heaped in piles and long highwalls loomed on either side of the iron-stained river.  Most of the mines in the vicinity were abandoned before 1977, and were therefore eligible for attention under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. In 1993, AML began work on the two miles of land adjacent to the North Fork.  The projects were divided into sections, Albert and Douglas, in order to distribute the cost over a few years.  The following is a brief review of the work completed by AML in the Douglas/Coketon area.

 

Albert Highwall Land Reclamation.  In June 1993, the Division of Environmental Protection began work on a 150 acre abandoned deep and surface mine complex along the North Fork known as the Albert Highwall.  The project included:

bullet

   Eliminating 11,000 L.F. of highwall

bullet

   Installing five wet seals and approximately 60 modified seals

bullet

   Regrading 50 acres of coal refuse

bullet

   Realigning a portion of Middle Run

bullet

   Constructing five water treatment systems and four anoxic limestone beds

bullet

   Installing approximately 4000 L.F. of underdrain

bullet

   Revegetating150 acres

The project was completed during October 1996 at a cost of $3,650,808.

Albert Surface Mine Complex: Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) from run off of the Albert surface mine complex drains into Long Run, a tributary of the North Fork.  Six passive water treatment systems were designed to capture AMD seepage from numerous sources.  Each treatment system consisted of a heavy plastic liner topped by calcium carbonate limestone and 12" of organic material.  Riprap and fabriform channels were installed to prevent erosion. 


Douglas Highwall Land Reclamation Project: consisted of 62 acres of abandoned mine land and began in April 1993. This project included:

bullet

Excavating and regrading steeply sloped mine spoil and refuse material

bullet

Backfilling and eliminating 4,200 L.F. of highwall

bullet

Constructing a dewatering ditch and subdrain along the highwall

bullet

Stabilizing roadway

bullet

Wet-sealing and dry-sealing six collapsed and open deep mine portals

bullet

Constructing a composted anoxic limestone ditch (ALD)

bullet

Soil conditioning and revegetation.

This project was completed in September 1995 at a cost $1,446,449.
 

Water Treatment: Abandoned deep mine #29 is the largest contributor to AMD in the Douglas project.  High flows of water from this mine have always been a problem.  The Chief Inspector of the West Virginia Department of Mines observed in his 1904 annual report that “an unusual amount of water is generated at #29, and the drainage is not very good.”  The #29 mine stands adjacent to the old railroad grade and generates a large volume of acid water very close to the North Fork.  The passive treatment system chosen for this project was an experimental design combining an anoxic limestone drain (ALD) and wetland system.  At the time of construction, it was the largest treatment system of its type in the United States.

Current Condition: Reclamation of the Douglas and Albert projects has transformed the land, but the North Fork of the Blackwater is still receiving large loads of AMD from both sites.  Many of the passive water treatment systems designed to decrease the impact of AMD to the North Fork are not working as they were intended.  The ALD treating water from mine #29 produced good results during the first two years of operation with water exiting the wetland drain measuring a pH of 6.8-7.3.  In subsequent years, however, the pH dropped drastically and currently measures 3.1. Treatment ponds on the Albert site display a similar pattern.  Currently, only one treatment system is releasing water with a pH higher than 4.0.  Long Run, which receives water from the Albert water treatment systems, measures a pH of 2.7 as it enters the North Fork.

Other water quality concerns include sites that were not addressed at all during the reclamation projects in the 1990’s.  These include several AMD seepage sited on the east side of the North Fork as well as a drainage from a deep mine at the edge of the town of Thomas.  This drainage travels from the mine opening, through a culvert under Rt. 32 and down a riprap channel.  A significant amount of aluminum precipitates as the water flows down and joins with the North Fork.

 

 

Home ]

Send mail to info@northforkwatershed.org with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 03/31/06